Reference
Scientific Grant Peer Review Platform glossary
Terms used in Scientific Grant Peer Review Platform and its documentation.
Applies to Scientific Grant Peer Review Platform as it works today. Moraph updates the platform continuously, and this page is reviewed when it changes.
Terms used in Scientific Grant Peer Review Platform and its documentation.
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Scientific review officer | The staff member who builds panels, decides on conflicts, assigns applications and runs meetings. |
| Conflict flag | A possible conflict of interest between a reviewer and an application, found from data and disclosures and decided by a review officer. |
| Single-blind review | Reviewers see who the applicants are, but applicants do not learn who reviewed them. |
| Anonymized review | Applicant-identifying details the platform can detect are withheld from reviewer copies, which staff check before release. |
| Critique | A reviewer's written assessment of an application against each review criterion. |
| Preliminary score | The score a reviewer enters before the panel meeting. |
| Final score | The score eligible panel members enter after discussion. |
| Summary statement | The released account of the review, drafted from critiques and discussion notes and edited by the review officer. |
| Panel | The group of reviewers who review and discuss a set of applications. |
Was this page helpful?
Report a problem with this page
Need help with your own setup rather than this page? Raise a support ticket.